Advertisement
Full length article| Volume 283, P136-140, April 2023

Download started.

Ok

Severe maternal morbidity trends over 20 years in a tertiary referral stand-alone maternity unit

Published:February 14, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.02.009

      Highlights

      • The rate of SMM has increased threefold over 20 years.
      • ICU transfer rates more than double.
      • Peripartum hysterectomy rates remain stable.

      Abstract

      Objective

      Severe maternal morbidity (SMM) is a better indicator of quality of care than maternal mortality, which is a rare event. Risk factors such as advanced maternal age, caesarean section (CS) and obesity are increasing. The aim of this study was to examine the rate and trends in SMM at our hospital over a 20-year period.

      Study design

      Retrospective review was performed of cases of SMM from January 1st 2000 to December 31st 2019. Yearly rates for SMM and Major Obstetric Haemorrhage (MOH) were calculated (per 1000 maternities) and linear regression analysis was used to model the trends over time. Average SMM and MOH rates were also calculated for the periods 2000–2009 and 2010–2019 and compared using a chi-square test. The patient demographics of the SMM group were compared to the background population delivered at our hospital using a chi-square test.

      Results

      702 women with SMM were identified out of 162,462 maternities over the study period yielding an incidence of 4.3 per 1000 maternities. When the two time periods (2000–2009 and 2010–2019) are compared, the rate of SMM increased 2.4 vs 6.2 (p < 0.001), largely due to an increase in MOH 1.72 vs 3.86 (p < 0.001) and pulmonary embolus (PE) also increased 0.2 vs 0.5 (p = 0.012). Intensive-care unit (ICU) transfer rates more than doubled 0.19 vs 0.44 (p = 0.006). Eclampsia rates decreased 0.3 vs 0.1 (p = 0.047) but the rate of peripartum hysterectomy 0.39 vs 0.38 (p = 0.495), uterine rupture 0.16 vs 0.14 (p = 0.867), cardiac arrest (0.04 vs 0.04) and cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) (0.04 vs 0.04) remained unchanged. Maternal age > 40 years 9.7% vs 5% (p = 0.005), previous CS 25.7% vs 14.4%; p < 0.001 and multiple pregnancy 8 vs 3.6% (p = 0.002) were more prevalent in the SMM cohort compared to the hospital population.

      Conclusions

      Overall, rates of SMM have increased threefold and transfer for ICU care has doubled over 20 years in our unit. The main driver is MOH. The rate of eclampsia has decreased and peripartum hysterectomy, uterine rupture, CVA and cardiac arrest remain unchanged. Advanced maternal age, previous caesarean delivery and multiple pregnancy were more prevalent in the SMM cohort compared to the background population.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • Knight M.
        • Tuffnell D.
        A view from the UK: The UK and Ireland confidential enquiry into maternal deaths and morbidity.
        Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 61: 347-358
        • Leitao S.
        • Manning E.
        • Greene R.A.
        • Corcoran P.
        • Byrne B.
        • Cooley S.
        • et al.
        Maternal morbidity and mortality: an iceberg phenomenon.
        BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022; 129 (Available from): 402-411
        • Callaghan W.M.
        • Creanga A.A.
        • Kuklina E.V.
        Severe maternal morbidity among delivery and postpartum hospitalizations in the United States.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120 (Available from): 1029-1036
      1. Mantel GD, Buchmann E, Rees H, Pattinson RC. Severe acute maternal morbidity: A pilot study of a definition for a near-miss. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 [cited 2022 Aug 10];105(9):985–90. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9763050/.

        • Lennox C.
        • Marr L.
        Scottish Confidential Audit of Severe Maternal Morbidity: reducing avoidable harm.
        Healthcare Improvement Scotland. 2014; (Available from:)
        • Kilpatrick S.K.
        • Ecker J.L.
        Severe maternal morbidity: screening and review. Obstetric Care Consensus No. 5.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 215: B17-B22https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.050
      2. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. Severe Maternal Morbidity in the United States | Pregnancy | Reproductive Health |CDC [Internet]. [cited 2022 Aug 10]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/severematernalmorbidity.html#anchor_References.

        • Say L.
        • Pattinson R.C.
        • Gülmezoglu A.M.
        WHO systematic review of maternal morbidity and mortality: The prevalence of severe acute maternal morbidity (near miss).
        Reprod Health. 2004; 1: 9-10
      3. World Health Organization. Evaluating the quality of care for severe pregnancy complications. The WHO near-miss approach for maternal health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2011 [cited 2022 Sep 14]. Available from: www.who.int/reproductivehealthISBN9789241502221.

      4. Knight M, Bunch K, Tuffnell D, Patel R, Shakespeare J, Kotnis R, et al. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care. Lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2017-2019. Maternal, Newborn and Infant Clinical Outcome Review Programme. MBRACE-UK Matern Newborn Infant Clin Outcome Rev Program. 2021 [cited 2022 Aug 15];(Core report):5–18. Available from: www.hqip.org.uk/national-programmes.

        • Leitao S.
        • Manning E.
        • Corcoran P.
        • San Lazaro Campillo I.
        • Keane J.
        • McKernan J.
        • et al.
        Severe maternal morbidity in Ireland. Annual report 2020.
        Cork Natl Perinat Epidemiol Cent. 2022; (Available from: www.ucc.ie/en/npec/)
        • O’Hare M.
        • Manning E.
        • Corcoran P.
        • Greene R.
        • on behalf of MDE Ireland
        Confidential Maternal Death Enquiry in Ireland. Report for 2016 - 2018.
        Cork MDE Irel. 2020;
      5. World Health Organisation. Trends in Maternal Mortality: 2000-2017: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. 2019 [cited 2022 Sep 16]; Available from: www.who.int/reproductivehealth.

      6. Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital. Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital. Annual Clinical Report 1999-2019. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.coombe.ie/annual-report.

        • O’Malley E.G.
        • Popivanov P.
        • Fergus A.
        • Tan T.
        • Byrne B.
        Maternal near miss: What lies beneath?.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016; 1: 116-120
      7. Leitao S, Manning E, Corcoran P, San Lazaro Campillo I, Greene R, On behalf of the Severe Maternal Morbidity Group. Severe Maternal Morbidity in Ireland Annual Report 2019. 2021; Available from: https://www.ucc.ie/en/media/research/nationalperinatalepidemiologycentre/NPECSMM2018LaySummaryFinalupdated.pdf.

        • Lutomski J.E.
        • Byrne B.M.
        • Devane D.
        • Greene R.A.
        Increasing trends in atonic postpartum haemorrhage in Ireland: An 11-year population-based cohort study.
        BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012; 119 (Available from): 306-314
        • Bell S.F.
        • Kitchen T.
        • John M.
        • Scarr C.
        • Kelly K.
        • Bailey C.
        • et al.
        Designing and implementing an all Wales postpartum haemorrhage quality improvement project: OBS Cymru (the Obstetric Bleeding Strategy for Wales).
        BMJ Open Qual. 2020; 9 (Available from:)
        • Mcdonald S.J.
        • Kellie F.J.
        Prophylactic ergometrine-oxytocin versus oxytocin for the third stage of labour.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004; 2004 (Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC6491201/)
        • Roger C.
        • Harman J.
        • Selo-Ojeme D.
        The management of the third stage of labour - A national survey of current practice.
        Br J Midwifery. 2012; 20 (Available from): 850-857
      8. Health Service Executive. Perinatal Statistics Report, 2019 [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Sep 17]. Available from: www.hpo.ie.

        • Reynolds C.M.E.
        • Egan B.
        • McMahon L.
        • O’Malley E.G.
        • Sheehan S.R.
        • Turner M.J.
        Maternal obesity trends in a large Irish university hospital.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019; 238 (Available from): 95-99
      9. Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. Reducing the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism during Pregnancy and the Puerperium. Green-top Guideline No. 37a. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 [cited 2022 Aug 10];(37):1–35. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/guidance/browse-all-guidance/green-top-guidelines/reducing-the-risk-of-thrombosis-and-embolism-during-pregnancy-and-the-puerperium-green-top-guideline-no-37a/.

      10. Institute of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists - Royal College of Physicians of Ireland, HSE Clinical Care Programme in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Irish Haematology Society. Clinical Practice Guideline: Venous Thromboprophylaxis in Pregnancy. 2016;(20):1–28.

        • Le Ray C.
        • Pelage L.
        • Seco A.
        • Bouvier-Colle M.H.
        • Chantry A.A.
        • Deneux-Tharaux C.
        • et al.
        Risk of severe maternal morbidity associated with in vitro fertilisation: a population-based study.
        BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019; 126 (Available from): 1033-1041
        • Nair M.
        • Kurinczuk J.J.
        • Knight M.
        Ethnic variations in severe maternal morbidity in the UK- A case control study.
        PLoS One. 2014; 9 (Available from:)
        • Main E.K.
        • Abreo A.
        • McNulty J.
        • Gilbert W.
        • McNally C.
        • Poeltler D.
        • et al.
        Measuring severe maternal morbidity: validation of potential measures.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 214 (Available from): 643.e1-643.e10