Abstract
Objective: To appreciate the role of success rates of external cephalic versions and breech
deliveries, in order to assess the risk reduction in women with breech presentation
at term. Study design: We reviewed the patient files of all women with breech presentation whom had an attempt
of external cephalic version (ECV) at term. Most of the ECVs were performed under
intravenous ritodrine infusion. All women had a trial of labor (TOL) as long as they
did not meet one or more of the exclusion criteria of vaginal delivery. Success rates
of ECV and TOL were assessed, and statistical analysis was performed by using the
student t-test for continuous data, and the Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests for categorical
data. Statistically significant differences required a P value of <0.05. Results: Of all women with breech presentation at term and not in labor, who had no contraindication
for an ECV, 164 consented and were included in the study. The success rate of ECV
was 30% (22/74) and 67% (60/90) for nulliparae and multiparae, respectively. Multiparity
was the only significant positive predicting variable for ECV success (OR=4.73, 95%
CI 4.19–5.27, P=0.00001). Of all the women that underwent a successful ECV, 18/22 primiparae (82%),
and 52/60 multiparae (87%) had a vaginal delivery, compared to only 52% of the primiparae
and 63% of the multiparae that reached labor with a breech presentation. There were
no significant perinatal complications except for one case of mild placental abruption.
In the primiparous women, ECV decreased the chance of cesarean delivery by only 9%
(P=0.2), compared to a 16% decrease in the multiparae (P=0.019). Conclusions: When counseling women with breech presentation at term, complete information is needed
for consent, and should take into account the success rate of ECVs and of vaginal
breech deliveries in the specific center.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive BiologyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Cunningham F.G. MacDonald P.C. Gant N.F. Leveno K.J. Gilstrap L.C. Hankins G.D.V. Clark S.I. Dystocia Due To Abnormalities in Presentation, Position, or Development of the Fetus. Williams Obstetrics. 20th ed. Appleton and Lange, USA1993
- Controversies: selective vaginal delivery for breech presentation.J. Perinat. Med. 1996; 24: 553-559
- Efficacy of external cephalic version: a review.Obstet. Gynecol. 1993; 82: 306-312
- Predictors of successful external cephalic version at term: a prospective study.Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1997; 104: 798-802
- Ultrasonography and external cephalic version at term.Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1990; 162: 1542-1545
- Maternal and fetal factors affecting success of antepartum external cephalic version.Obstet. Gynecol. 1987; 70: 722-725
- External cephalic version with tocolysis: factors associated with success.Obstet. Gynecol. 1988; 72: 59-62
- When does external cephalic version succeed?.Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 1990; 69: 281-285
- External cephalic version and spontaneous version rates: ethnic and other determinants.Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1986; 93: 13-16
- Predicting success of external cephalic version.Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1993; 169: 245-249
- External cephalic version at term using tocolysis.Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 1993; 72: 455-457
Article info
Publication history
Accepted:
August 19,
1999
Received in revised form:
July 14,
1999
Received:
April 13,
1999
Identification
Copyright
© 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.